Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Journal
Document Type
Year range
1.
Cancer ; 126(17): 3896-3899, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-401377

ABSTRACT

The treatment of patients with cancer who test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses unique challenges. In this commentary, the authors describe the ethical rationale and implementation details for the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary treatment prioritization committee, including physicians, frontline staff, an ethicist, and an infectious disease expert. Organizational obligations to health care workers also are discussed. The treatment prioritization committee sets a threshold of acceptable harm to patients from decreased cancer control that is justified to reduce risk to staff. The creation of an ethical, consistent, and transparent decision-making process involving such frontline stakeholders is essential as departments across the country are faced with decisions regarding the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Health Personnel/ethics , Neoplasms/complications , Pandemics/ethics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Quality of Health Care/ethics , Ambulatory Care/ethics , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Patient Safety , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL